RSI (Relative Strength Index)
What it shows: "Overbought" (>70) and "oversold" (<30).
Myth: RSI > 70 = sell. RSI < 30 = buy.
Reality: In a strong trend, RSI can stay overbought for hours while you lose money on "reversals."
Beginners often search for the "best indicator" โ a magic formula that shows where price will go. Spoiler: no such indicator exists. But understanding indicators is still useful โ if you know their limitations.
All indicators are derivatives of price. They show the past, not the future.
The problem: when an indicator gives a signal โ the move has often already finished.
What it shows: "Overbought" (>70) and "oversold" (<30).
Myth: RSI > 70 = sell. RSI < 30 = buy.
Reality: In a strong trend, RSI can stay overbought for hours while you lose money on "reversals."
What it shows: Moving average convergence/divergence, trend momentum.
Myth: Line crossover = entry signal.
Reality: Lags. When MACD crosses โ the move has often gone halfway already.
What it shows: Price position relative to range over a period.
Myth: Works like RSI โ overbought/oversold zones.
Reality: Same problems โ gives false reversal signals in trends.
What it shows: Volatility and price deviation from average.
Myth: Price at upper band = sell, at lower = buy.
Reality: In trends, price "rides the band" โ counter entries lose money.
Typical YouTube strategy: "RSI + MACD + Stochastic = 90% win rate." Why it doesn't work:
Indicators can be useful if:
Not "RSI < 30 = buy," but "RSI < 30 + bullish structure + order block = consider buying."
You have an idea based on Smart Money. Indicator can confirm: "yes, momentum is in your direction."
Price above MA 200 = likely bullish market. Rough filter, but it works.
If using indicators โ one. Maximum two. More = chart chaos.
In Smart Money, instead of indicators we use:
This isn't "better" or "worse" than indicators. It's a different approach โ based on understanding, not formulas.